Ewing's Sarcoma Patient Treated with New Drug / ARIAD REPORTS TUMOR REGRESSION WITH AP23573 AS A SINGLE AGENT IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED AND/OR REFRACTORY CANCER

ARIAD REPORTS TUMOR REGRESSION WITH AP23573 AS A SINGLE AGENT

IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED AND/OR REFRACTORY CANCER

Updated Phase 1 Clinical Results on Novel mTOR Inhibitor Presented at

International Cancer Symposium

Cambridge, MA, September 30, 2004 – ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq:

ARIA) today

announced, for the first time, updated results of two Phase 1 clinical

trials of its novel mTOR

inhibitor, AP23573 as a single agent, showing documented tumor

regression in patients with

advanced cancers – most of whom had progressive disease upon entering

the trial and

virtually all of whom had failed alternative treatments. These clinical

results are being

presented today at the 2004 EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium on Molecular

Targets and

Cancer Therapeutics in Geneva, Switzerland.

Combined Trial Results: Anti-tumor Responses

Of 49 evaluable patients in the two trials, tumor regression was

demonstrated in 9 patients (4

“partial responses” by RECIST with at least 30% reduction in tumor size

and 5 “minor

responses” with 15% to 29% reduction). In an additional 15 patients,

disease stabilization

was achieved. Overall, 49% (24 of 49) of the patients in the two trials

had documented antitumor

responses (including partial and minor responses and stable disease),

with a median

response of 5 months in those demonstrating anti-tumor responses,

extending to greater than

18 months – the longest treatment to date.

Anti-tumor responses were demonstrated in 9 different refractory and/or

relapsed cancers,

including all evaluable patients with sarcoma (5 of 5), kidney cancer (7

of 7) and lymphoma (1

of 1), as well as 2 of 3 patients with non-small cell lung (NSCL) cancer.

“We are extremely encouraged by the number of patients with relapsed

and/or refractory

cancer who demonstrated tumor regression with AP23573 in Phase 1

clinical trials, as well as

the breadth of tumors that are responding to our novel mTOR inhibitor,”

said Harvey J. Berger,

M.D., chairman and chief executive officer of ARIAD. “As a clinician, I

was particularly

struck by the results in one patient with a Ewing’s sarcoma who had

received nine prior

anticancer regimens. After four cycles of AP23573, CT scans showed a 62%

reduction in the

size of the mass; this patient continues on study. Phase 2 studies of

AP23573 are ongoing in

patients with hematologic cancers and solid tumors.”

Daily Dosing Trial Results

In the 27 evaluable patients in the daily dosing trial – the dosing

regimen being used in

current Phase 2 clinical trials – AP23573 produced tumor regression in 7

patients:

• Partial response – Sarcoma, lymphoma, and NSCL cancer (1 each)

• Minor response – Sarcoma, NSCL, kidney, and thyroid cancers (1 each).

An additional 9 patients in this trial had stabilization of their

disease (overall 59% with

anti-tumor response).

Weekly Dosing Trial Results

In the 22 evaluable patients in the weekly dosing trial, AP23573 also

produced tumor

regression in 2 patients, both with particularly difficult-to-treat

cancers, even when the drug

was administered only once each week:

• Partial response – Bladder cancer (1) (unconfirmed, repeat scans pending)

• Minor response – Mesothelioma, a form of chest-cavity cancer (1).

An additional 6 patients in this trial had stabilization of their

disease (overall 36% with antitumor

response).

Additional Combined Trial Results

The daily dosing trial is ongoing at the Institute for Drug Development,

Cancer Therapy and

Research Center, San Antonio (M. Mita, M.D. and A. Tolcher, M.D.), and

the weekly dosing

trial is ongoing at the University of Chicago Cancer Center (A. Desai,

M.D. and M. Ratain,

M.D.).

AP23573 has been well tolerated by patients in both trials, with

generally mild or moderate,

readily reversible adverse events. The dose-limiting toxicity was severe

oral mucositis, an

inflammatory irritation of the mucous membranes of the mouth and a

common finding in

cancer patients on various types of treatments.

Pharmacodynamic assays on patient samples demonstrated a good

correlation of blood levels

of AP23573 with inhibition of AP23573’s molecular target, the protein

mTOR. Greater than

90% inhibition was observed within 1 hour after dosing in all patients

in both trials. With

daily dosing of AP23573, there was sustained inhibition of mTOR activity

for up to 10 days in

the majority of patients studied.

The pharmacokinetic (blood-clearance) profile of AP23573 was found to be

highly predictable

and reproducible, with a median half-life of 49 hours for all patients

with complete data in the

two trials. In contrast to other mTOR inhibitors in clinical trials,

AP23573 was stable in vivo

and is not a pro-drug.

About AP23573

The small-molecule drug, AP23573, starves cancer cells and shrinks

tumors by inhibiting the

critical cell-signaling protein, mTOR, which regulates the response of

tumor cells to nutrients

and growth factors, and controls tumor blood supply and angiogenesis

through effects on

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).

About the Company

ARIAD is engaged in the discovery and development of breakthrough

medicines to treat cancer

by regulating cell signaling with small molecules. The Company is

developing a comprehensive

approach to patients with cancer that addresses the greatest medical

need – aggressive and

advanced-stage cancers for which current treatments are inadequate.

ARIAD also has an

exclusive license to pioneering technology and patents related to

certain NF-κB treatment

methods, and the discovery and development of drugs to regulate NF-κB

cell-signaling activity,

which may be useful in treating certain diseases. Additional information

about ARIAD can be

found on the web at http://www.ariad.com.

Some of the matters discussed herein are “forward-looking statements”

within the meaning of the

Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are

identified by the use of words

such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,”

“believe,” and other words and

terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future

operating or financial

performance. Such statements are based on management’s current

expectations and are subject to certain

factors, risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, outcome

of events, timing and

performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such

forward-looking statements.

These risks include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties

regarding the Company’s ability to

accurately estimate the actual research and development expenses and

other costs associated with the

preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates, the

adequacy of our capital resources

and the availability of additional funding, risks and uncertainties

regarding the Company’s ability

to successfully conduct preclinical and clinical studies of its product

candidates, risks and uncertainties

that clinical trial results, such as those noted in this press release,

at any phase of development may

be adverse or may not be predictive of future result or lead to

regulatory approval of any of the

Company’s product candidates, and risks and uncertainties relating to

regulatory oversight,

intellectual property claims, the timing, scope, cost and outcome of

legal proceedings, future capital

needs, key employees, dependence on the Company’s collaborators and

manufacturers, markets,

economic conditions, products, services, prices, reimbursement rates,

competition and other risks

detailed in the Company’s public filings with the Securities and

Exchange Commission, including

ARIAD’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December

31, 2003. The information

contained in this document is believed to be current as of the date of

original issue. The Company does

not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the

date of this document to conform

these statements to actual results or to changes in the Company’s

expectations, except as required by

law.

###

CONTACT: Tom Pearson

(610) 407-9260

Kelly Lindenboom

(617) 621-2345

Study of Late Effects Due to Treatment in Patients Previously Treated for Pediatric Sarcoma

http://www.nci.nih.gov/clinical_trials/view_clinicaltrials.aspx?cdrid=68407&version=healthprofessional

Study of Late Effects Due to Treatment in Patients Previously Treated for
Pediatric Sarcoma

Last Modified: 12/10/2002     First Published: 2/1/2001  

Alternate Title
Basic Trial Information
Objectives
Entry Criteria
Projected Accrual
Outline
Published Results
Trial Contact Information

Alternate Title

Long-Term Effects of Therapy in Patients Previously Treated for Childhood
Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Basic Trial Information

Phase
Type
Status
Age
Sponsor
Protocol
IDs


No phase specified



Supportive care



Active



2 and over



NCI



NCI-01-C-0037C


Special Category: NIH
Clinical Center trial

Objectives

  1. Determine the incidence and degree of functional
    musculoskeletal impairment, late cardiac dysfunction induced by doxorubicin,
    gonadal dysfunction induced by alkylator-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy,
    and metabolic stress syndrome induced by dose-intensive chemotherapy in patients
    previously treated for pediatric sarcoma.
  2. Determine whether these patients have diminished
    bone mineral density.
  3. Correlate gonadal dysfunction and metabolic stress
    syndrome with loss of bone mass in these patients.
  4. Determine the quality of life of these patients.
  5. Determine the frequency and patterns of adaptational
    and adjustment difficulties with distinction of clinical or subclinical psychiatric
    illness in these patients.
  6. Determine myocardial tissue changes associated
    with anthracycline therapy and the cardiac function of patients treated with
    or without the cardioprotectant dexrazoxane.
  7. Determine the incidence and frequency of secondary
    malignancies, hepatitis B, C, or HIV seroconversion, and ifosfamide-related
    renal dysfunction in these patients.
  8. Determine the T-cell depletion following chemotherapy
    in these patients.

Entry Criteria

Disease Characteristics:

  • Diagnosis of sarcoma in first remission or continued
    remission of more than 5 years after completion of salvage therapy for disease
    relapse

    • Stable disease for more than 24 months

      OR

    • No evidence of disease
  • Prior enrollment on a National Cancer Institute
    Pediatric Oncology Branch (POB) protocol or the Natural History protocol
    and treated according to POB outlines for sarcomas
  • Received prior chemotherapy according to prior
    POB trial

Prior/Concurrent
Therapy:

Biologic therapy:

  • At least 24 months since prior immunotherapy

Chemotherapy:

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 24 months since prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy:

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy:

  • At least 24 months since prior radiotherapy

Surgery:

  • At least 24 months since prior surgery for cancer

Patient Characteristics:

Age:

  • 2 and over

Performance status:

  • Not specified

Life expectancy:

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic:

  • Not specified

Hepatic:

  • Not specified

Renal:

  • Not specified

Other:

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test

Projected Accrual

Approximately 50-100 patients will be accrued for this study
within 1-2 years.

Outline

Patients undergo evaluation of the following: cardiac dysfunction
by echocardiogram, MUGA scan, and cardiac MRI with gadolinium texaphyrin
contrast; gonadal dysfunction by physical examination, endocrine testing,
and semen analysis; hormonal stress by serum hormone levels; musculoskeletal
impairment by bone densitometry and musculoskeletal and functional testing
by rehabilitation medicine specialists; transfusion-associated risks by
hepatitis A, B, C, HIV, and HTLV-1 testing; and other major organ impairments.

Quality of life and psychosocial effects (including post-traumatic
stress syndrome) are also assessed.

Disclaimer

The purpose of most clinical trials listed
in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing,
screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects
are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications
may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment
or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended
for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may
not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator
associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this
protocol.

Published Results

Mansky PJ, Hoffman K, Derdak J, et al.: Preserved functionality and increased
cardiovascular disease risk in pediatric sarcoma long-term survivors. [Abstract]
Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-3261, 2003.

Mansky PJ, Lawande N, Long L, et al.: MRI evidence for cardiac remodeling
in longterm pediatric sarcoma survivors of doxorubicin therapy. [Abstract]
Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-1559, 2002.

Wiener L, Battles H, Long L, et al.: Persistent psychological distress
in long-term survivors of pediatric sarcoma. [Abstract] Proceedings of the
American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-2912, 2002.

Trial Contact Information

Trial Lead Organizations

NCI – Center for Cancer Research

Patrick
Mansky
, MD, Protocol chair
Ph: 301-435-4845
Email: manskyp@mail.nih.gov 1

Trial Sites and Contacts

U.S.A.
Maryland
  Bethesda
  Warren
Grant Magnuson Clinical Center – NCI Clinical Studies Support
  Patient Recruitment

Ph:  888-NCI-1937

Table of Links

1 manskyp@mail.nih.gov

Excellent Listing of Trials and other Information for Ewing's Sarcoma, Cooperation Research Centre, Semmelweis University, Hungary

http://195.228.254.34/kkk/kernel/ewing.php?FrmPart=FT

Table of contents

  1. History, classsical clinics and pathology

    1. History
    2. Ewing Sarcoma Family of Tumors
    3. Origin of Ewing sarcoma
    4. General pathology
  2. Molecular pathology

    1. General considerations
    2. Specific translocations of Ewing sarcoma
    3. Specificity of translocations
    4. Other genetic abnormalities
    5. Clinical impact of genetic abnormalities
    6. Gene dysregulations reported in ESFT
  3. Diagnostics

    1. Clinical findings
    2. Laboratory changes
    3. Diagnostic imaging
    4. Biopsy and Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy
      (FNAB)
    5. Light microscopy
    6. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
    7. Ultrastructural phenotypes investigated by
      electronmicroscopy
    8. Molecular technics
  4. Staging

    1. Localized
    2. Metastatic
    3. Staging in the clinical use
  5. Prognosis
  6. Classical therapeutic approaches

    1. Treatment Overview
    2. Surgery
    3. Chemotherapy
    4. Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
      (PBSCT)
    5. Radiation Therapy
  7. Clinical trials

    1. Running clinical trials
    2. Phase III Randomized Study of Standard Induction
      Therapy Followed by Consolidation Therapy with Vincristine, Dactinomycin,
      and Ifosfamide Versus Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Versus
      Busulfan, Melphalan, and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Support, with
      or without Radiotherapy and/or Surgery, in Patients with Tumor of the Ewing's
      Family
    3. Diagnostic Study of Tumor Characteristics
      in Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma
    4. Diagnostic Study of Whole-body Fast MRI and
      Conventional Imaging for Detecting Distant Metastases in Pediatric Patients
      with Solid Tumor Malignancies or Lymphoma
    5. Phase I Study of 17-N-Allylamino-17-Demethoxy
      Geldanamycin (17-AAG) in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Cancer, Malignant
      Lymphoma, or Sarcoma
    6. Phase I Study of 7-day or 21-day ABT-751
      in Children with Refractory Solid Tumors
    7. Phase I Study of BMS-247550 in Children with
      Refractory Solid Tumors
    8. Phase I Study of Docetaxel, Gemcitabine,
      and Filgrastim (G-CSF) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
    9. Phase I Study of Interleukin-12 and Interleukin-2
      in Patients with Refractory or Advanced Solid Tumors
    10. Phase I Study of Tariquidar Combined with
      Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, or Vinorelbine in Children with Relapsed or Refractory
      Solid Tumors
    11. Phase I Study of Temozolomide and O6-benzylguanine
      in Children with Refractory Solid Tumors
    12. Phase I Study of Yttrium Y 90-DOTA-tyr3-octreotidein
      Children with Advanced or Refractory Somatostatin Receptor-positive Tumors
    13. Phase I/II Study of Temozolomide in Children
      with Newly Diagnosed Malignant Glioma or Recurrent CNS or Other Solid Tumors
    14. Phase II Pilot Study of Autologous T-cell
      Transplantation with Vaccine-driven Expansion of Antitumor Effectors after
      Cytoreductive Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Pediatric Sarcomas
    15. Phase II Pilot Study of Induction Chemotherapy
      Followed by Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients
      with High-risk, Recurrent Pediatric Sarcoma
    16. Phase II Pilot Study of Low-dose Vinblastine
      and Celecoxib in Combination with Standard Multiagent Chemotherapy in Patients
      With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing's Sarcoma Family of Tumors
    17. Phase II Study of Antineoplastons A10 and
      AS2-1 in Patients with Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors Outside of the Central
      Nervous System
    18. Phase II Study of Arsenic Trioxide in Patients
      with Advanced Neuroblastoma or Other Pediatric Solid Tumors
    19. Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Patients
      with Advanced or Metastatic Sarcoma
    20. Phase II Study of Ecteinascidin 743 in Pediatric
      Patients with Recurrent or Refractory Soft Tissue Sarcomas or Ewing's Sarcoma
      Family of Tumors
    21. Phase II Study of Exatecan Mesylate in Patients
      with Ewing's Sarcoma, Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor, or Desmoplastic Small
      Round Cell Tumor
    22. Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients
      with Recurrent Ewing's Family of Tumors or Desmoplastic Small Round-cell
      Tumor
    23. Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients
      with Relapsed or Refractory Pediatric Solid Tumors
    24. Phase II Study of Irinotecan in Children
      with Refractory CNS or Solid Tumors
    25. Phase II Study of Sequential Gemcitabine
      and Docetaxel in Patients with Recurrent Osteosarcoma or Ewing's Sarcoma
      or Unresectable or Locally Recurrent Chondrosarcoma
    26. Phase III Pilot Randomized Study of Filgrastim-SD/01
      versus Filgrastim (G_CSF) with Concurrent Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly
      Diagnosed Sarcoma
    27. Phase III Randomized Study of Interval-compressed
      versus Standard Chemotherapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed, Localized
      Ewing's Sarcoma or Peripheral Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor
    28. Phase III Randomized Study of Standard Induction
      Therapy Followed by Consolidation Therapy with Vincristine, Dactinomycin,
      and Ifosfamide versus Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide versus
      Busulfan, Melphalan, and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Support, with
      or without Radiotherapy and/or Surgery, in Patients with Tumor of the Ewing's
      Family
    29. Phase III Study of Surgery Followed by Chemotherapy
      in Patients with Nonmetastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Randomization to
      3-Drug versus 6-Drug Continuation Therapy in Patients with High-risk Chemosensitive
    30. Randomized Study of Electroacupuncture for
      Treatment of Delayed Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients
      with Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Sarcomas
    31. Study of Late Effects Due to Treatment in
      Patients Previously Treated for Pediatric Sarcoma
    32. Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide
      and Dexrazoxane (VACdxr) with or without Immther for Newly Diagnosed High
      Risk Ewing's Sarcoma (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center)
    33. Surgery Followed by Chemotherapy in Treating
      Young Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma
    34. Combination Chemotherapy Followed by Bone
      Marrow Transplantation in Treating Patients with Rare Cancer (Memorial Sloan-Kettering
      Cancer Center)
    35. Oxaliplatine (Eloxatin).
    36. DX-8951F
    37. Radio Frequency Ablation
    38. Samarium Sm-153 Lexidronam (Quadramet)
    39. Bipolar Radiofrequency Interstitial Thermo
      Therapy (RFITT).
    40. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU).
    41. Photodynamic Therapy (PDT).
    42. Aptosyn (Exisulind).
    43. Holmium-166-DOTMP
  8. Novel therapeutic prospects

    1. PDGF-C
    2. c-myc
    3. Tenascin-C
    4. Id2
    5. TGFbeta II Receptor
    6. Cell cycle regulators: cyclin D1, cyclin
      E, p21, p27, p57KIP2
    7. BARD1
    8. NfkB and JNK
    9. COL11A2
    10. Pyk2
    11. Experiments in ESTF and other cell lines,
      tumor samples, and nude mice
  9. Best supportive care

    1. G-CSF
    2. Hydration
    3. Antiemetic therapy
    4. Blood component therapy
    5. Antimicrobic therapy
    6. Pneumocystis Pneumonitis Prophylaxis
    7. Nutrition
  10. Quality of life issues
  11. Measuring of QoL

    1. “Measuring” quality of life
    2. SF36 survey
  12. Other Resources on the internet

    1. Selected Ewing's Sarcoma Sites
    2. Search Selected Cancer Sites for “Ewing+Sarcoma”
    3. Search the Internet for “Ewing+Sarcoma”
    4. Cancer Specific Indexes
    5. General Medical Indexes
  13. References

Intravenous VEGF Trap in Treating Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui/show/NCT00083213

Intravenous VEGF Trap in Treating Patients With
Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

This study is currently recruiting patients.

Sponsored by

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center


Purpose

RATIONALE: VEGF Trap may stop the growth of solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma by stopping blood flow to the tumor.

PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of intravenous VEGF
Trap in treating patients who have relapsed or refractory advanced
solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Condition Treatment or Intervention Phase
Cancer  Drug: VEGF Trap
 Procedure: anti-cytokine therapy
 Procedure: antiangiogenesis therapy
 Procedure: biological response modifier therapy
 Procedure: growth factor antagonist therapy
 Procedure: targeted fusion protein therapy
Phase
I

MedlinePlus related
topics:  Cancer;  
Cancer Alternative Therapy

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment

Official Title: Phase I Study of Intravenous VEGF Trap
in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors or Non-Hodgkin's
Lymphoma

Further Study Details: 

OBJECTIVES: Primary

  • Determine the safety and tolerability of intravenous VEGF Trap in patients
    with relapsed or refractory advanced solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's
    lymphoma.

Secondary

  • Determine the maximum tolerated intravenous dose of this drug in these
    patients.
  • Determine the pharmacokinetics of this drug in these patients.
  • Determine the ability of this drug to bind circulating vascular endothelial
    growth factor in these patients.
  • Determine, preliminarily, the ability of this drug to alter tumor blood
    flow and tumor vascular permeability in these patients.
  • Determine whether antibodies to this drug develop in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is an open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter study.

Patients receive VEGF Trap IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 15 for a total
of 2 doses.

Cohorts of 3-6 patients receive escalating doses of VEGF Trap until the
maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is determined. The MTD is defined as the dose
preceding that at which 2 of 6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity.
Once the MTD is determined, an additional 6 patients are treated at that
dose level.

In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity, patients with stable disease
or partial or complete remission may continue to receive VEGF
Trap on a separate extension protocol.

Patients are followed at weeks 1, 3, and 7 and then at 3 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A maximum of 25 patients will be accrued for this study.


Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:  18 Years and above, 
Genders Eligible for Study:  Both

Criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of one of the following:
  • Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • Primary or metastatic solid tumor located, by radiography, in at least
    one of the following sites:
  • Liver
  • Soft tissue
  • Pelvis
  • Other site that is suitable for delayed contrast-enhanced MRI (e.g.,
    peripheral lung field)
  • Relapsed or refractory (including unresectable) disease
  • Patients with solid tumors must have failed all curative chemotherapeutic
    regimens
  • Patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma must be refractory to at least
    2 standard chemotherapeutic regimens and rituximab
  • Not amenable to available conventional therapies AND no standard therapy
    exists
  • Measurable disease
  • No prior or concurrent CNS metastases (brain or leptomeningeal)
  • No primary intracranial tumor by MRI or CT scan
  • No histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age

  • 18 and over

Performance status

  • ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • WBC ≥ 3,500/mm^3
  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm^3
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dL
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3
  • No severe or uncontrolled hematologic condition

Hepatic

  • Bilirubin ≤1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN
  • PT and PTT normal
  • INR normal
  • Hepatitis B surface antigen negative
  • Hepatitis C antibody negative

Renal

  • Creatinine ≤ ULN
  • Urine protein/creatinine ratio ≤ 1
  • No severe or uncontrolled renal condition

Cardiovascular

  • No clinically significant acute electrocardiographic abnormalities
  • LVEF normal by echocardiogram or MUGA within the past 12 months if
    there was prior exposure to anthracyclines
  • No untreated or uncontrolled hypertension
  • No blood pressure > 150/100 mm Hg (despite treatment)
  • No isolated systolic hypertension (i.e., systolic blood pressure >
    180 mm Hg on at least 2 determinations [on separate days] within
    the past 3 months)
  • No New York Heart Association class II – IV heart disease
  • No active coronary artery disease requiring acute medical management
  • No angina requiring acute medical management
  • No congestive heart failure requiring acute medical management
  • No ventricular arrhythmia requiring acute medical management
  • No stroke or transient ischemic event within the past 6 months
  • No prior or concurrent peripheral vascular disease
  • No angiographically or ultrasonographically documented arterial or
    venous occlusive event
  • No symptomatic claudication
  • No symptomatic orthostatic hypotension
  • No other severe or uncontrolled cardiovascular condition

Pulmonary

  • No severe or uncontrolled pulmonary condition
  • No pulmonary embolism within the past 6 months

Immunologic

  • HIV negative
  • No severe or uncontrolled immunologic condition
  • No active current infection requiring antibiotics
  • No prior hypersensitivity reaction to any recombinant proteins, including
    VEGF Trap

Other

  • No severe or uncontrolled gastrointestinal or musculoskeletal condition
  • No psychiatric condition or adverse social circumstance that would
    preclude study participation
  • No other condition that would preclude study participation
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective double-barrier contraception during
    and for 3 months after study treatment

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No prior participation in a VEGF Trap, interleukin-1 Trap, or interleukin-4/13
    Trap clinical trial
  • At least 3 weeks since prior immunotherapy and recovered
  • No concurrent epoetin alfa, filgrastim (G-CSF), or sargramostim (GM-CSF)

Chemotherapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • At least 3 weeks since prior chemotherapy and recovered

Endocrine therapy

  • No concurrent adrenal corticosteroids except low-dose replacement therapy
  • No concurrent systemic hormonal contraceptive agents

Radiotherapy

  • At least 3 weeks since prior radiotherapy and recovered

Surgery

  • At least 3 weeks since prior major or laparoscopic surgery and recovered
  • More than 6 months since prior surgical procedure for correction or
    prophylaxis of peripheral vascular insufficiency or cerebral
    ischemic events

Other

  • More than 30 days since prior investigational drugs
  • No concurrent anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs (e.g., warfarin,
    heparin, or aspirin) other than low-dose (1 mg) warfarin for
    maintaining patency of venous access devices
  • No concurrent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including cyclo-oxygenase-2
    (COX-2) inhibitors
  • No other concurrent anticancer investigational agents
  • No other concurrent anticancer therapy


Location
and Contact Information

New York
      Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York,  New York, 
10021,  United States; Recruiting

Jakob Dupont, MD  212-639-8984 
  dupontj@mskcc.org 

Study chairs or principal investigators
Jakob Dupont, MD,  Principal Investigator,  Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center   


More Information

Clinical
trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database

Study ID Numbers  CDR0000360856; 
MSKCC-03137; REGENERON-VGFT-ST-0202
Record last reviewed  April 2004
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier  NCT00083213
ClinicalTrials.gov processed
this record on 2004-08-31

Effect of Drug Treatment for Malignancy on Skeletal Health of Cancer Survivors

http://www.ingenta.com/isis/searching/Expand/ingenta?pub=infobike://hum/crbmm/2004/00000002/00000002/art00003

Effects of Drug Treatment for Malignancy on Skeletal Health of Cancer Survivors
 

Clinical Review in Bone and Mineral Metabolism
 

June 2004, vol. 2, no. 2,
 
pp. 103-114(12)
 
Heras-Herzig A.; Guise T.A.
 
Abstract:
Cancer treatment has advanced and survivorship is increasing. As
such, a new skeletal complication of malignancy, cancer treatment-induced
bone loss, has emerged and is likely to be the most common skeletal complication
of malignancy in years to come. Therapy for the most common cancers, breast
and prostate, often results in sex-steroid deficiency and subsequent bone
loss. A significant portion of breast cancers express estrogen receptors,
and estrogen stimulates tumor growth. Therapy directed against estrogen action
or to reduce estrogen production results in significant survival advantage
in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. This hormonal therapy
represents the mainstay of breast cancer treatment and is highly effective.
Many breast cancers are also treated with chemotherapy, which often induces
transient or permanent ovarian failure. However, estrogen is a critical factor
for maintaining bone health and normal bone mineral density. As such, all
of these breast cancer therapies may induce bone loss, mainly by reducing
estrogen or its action on bone. Aromatase inhibitors fall into this category;
its efficacy dictates that it will become first-line therapy for most hormone-sensitive
breast cancers. Theoretically, chemotherapy may have direct effects on bone
that are independent of the effects of estrogen deficiency, but evidence
is lacking. Limited clinical experience indicate that bisphosphonates are
effective in preventing bone loss owing to cancer treatment. This article
focuses on therapy for breast cancer and other malignancies and the respective
contributions of such therapy to bone loss.
 
Keywords: Bone; malignancy; antineoplastic
drugs; bone loss; skeletal health; osteoporosis
 
Document Type:
Miscellaneous ISSN: 1534-8644

DOI (article): NO_DOI
SICI (online): 1534-8644(20040601)2:2L.103;1-

 


 

Publisher: 
 
Humana Press

Temozolamide and O6-Benzylguanine for Treating Childhood Cancers

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui/show/NCT00005019;jsessionid=0241AA08819958F891B965BA834FDFC5?order=15

Temozolomide and O6-Benzylguanine for Treating
Childhood Cancers

This study is currently recruiting patients.

Sponsored by


Purpose

This study will investigate the combined use of temozolomide (TMZ) and
O6-benzylguanine (O6BG) for treating cancer. TMZ is an anti-cancer drug approved
to treat certain brain tumors in adults. TMZ loses its effectiveness over
time because a protein called AGT makes the tumor resistant to the drug.
O6BG inactivates AGT and, therefore, may prolong TMZ's effectiveness.

Children and young adults under age 21 with various types of cancer (brain,
liver, bone and others) for whom standard treatment was not successful may
be eligible for this study. Participants will receive TMZ capsules by mouth
and an intravenous (through a vein) infusion of O6BG 5 days in a row every
month for up to 12 months. Blood will be drawn on days 3 and 5 of the first
course of treatment to measure AGT levels. Also on day 5 of the first treatment
course, 16 blood samples (1 teaspoon each) will be taken over a 48-hour period
to study how the two drugs work in the body. If possible, a heparin lock
will be placed in the vein to avoid having multiple needle sticks. A tissue
biopsy (removal of a small piece of tumor) may be taken if the tumor is close
to the skin and not near a vital organ. The sample will be used to evaluate
the effect of O6BG on AGT levels.

A doctor will see the patients weekly. Routine blood tests will be done
twice a week. MRI or CT scans will be done before treatment begins and every
1 to 2 months during treatment to measure the size of the tumor. Patients
with a brain tumor will also have a magnetic resonance spectroscopic test
(similar to MRI) every 1 to 2 months to measure chemicals in the tumor. Patients
will complete a Quality of Life Assessment questionnaire about the effect
of the illness on the patient's behavior and everyday activities.

Potential benefits to patients in this study are tumor shrinkage and symptom
improvement, such as pain relief. Because this is an experimental
therapy, however, the likelihood of tumor shrinkage cannot be predicted.

Condition Treatment or Intervention Phase
Brain Neoplasm
Embryonal Neoplasm
Ewing's Sarcoma
Germ Cell Neoplasm
Liver Neoplasm
Nephroblastoma
Osteosarcoma
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Sarcoma
 Drug: O(6) Benzylguanine Phase
I

MedlinePlus related
topics:  Bone Cancer;  
Brain Cancer;  
Cancer;  
Cancer Alternative Therapy;  
Liver Cancer;  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma;  
Wilms' Tumor

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Treatment, Safety

Official Title: Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study
of Temozolomide and O(6)-Benzylguanine in Childhood Solid Tumors

Further Study Details: 

Temozolomide is a prodrug that spontaneously degrades to the active metabolite,
MTIC, under physiologic conditions. MTIC is an alkylating agent that preferentially
methylates the O(6)-position on guanine. The DNA repair protein, O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA
alkyltransferase (AGT) removes the methyl group from the O(6)-position of
guanine, repairing the lesion produced by MTIC. AGT is expressed in many
tumors and has been associated with tumor resistance and poor clinical response
to methylating agents, such as the nitrosoureas and temozolomide. O(6)-Benzylguanine
(O(6)BG) is an AGT substrate that permanently inactivates AGT. O(6)BG depletes
tumor AGT, blocks repair of the lesion produced by temozolomide and thereby
enhances its cytotoxicity.

A pediatric phase I trial using the combination of temozolomide and O(6)BG
on a daily times 5 days schedule every 4 weeks will be conducted in children
with refractory solid tumors and brain tumors to determine the maximum tolerated
dose (MTD) of temozolomide when given in combination with a biologically
active dose of O(6)BG. Pharmacokinetic studies of O(6)BG and temozolomide
will also be performed.


Eligibility

Genders Eligible for Study:  Both

Criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA:
1. Age: Patients must be less than or equal to 21 years of age.
2. Histological diagnosis: Patients must have a histologically confirmed solid
tumor, which may include, but is not limited to, rhabdomyosarcoma and other
soft tissue sarcomas, Ewing's family tumors, osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma,
Wilms' tumor, hepatic tumors, germ cell tumors or primary brain tumor. For
patients with brainstem gliomas or optic gliomas, the requirement for histological
confirmation may be waived.
3. Prior therapy:
3.1 The patient's tumor must be refractory to standard treatment. Patients
must have no known potentially curative therapy available to them. Curative
therapy may include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or any combination
of these modalities.
3.2 Patients must have had their last dose of limited-field radiation therapy
at least four weeks prior to study entry. Patients who have received extensive
prior radiation therapy (craniospinal radiation, total body radiation, or
radiation to more than half of the pelvis) must be at least 4 months post-completion
of radiation therapy. Patients must have received their last dose of chemotherapy
at least three weeks prior to study entry (four weeks for nitrosoureas),
and their last investigational therapy at least four weeks prior to study
entry.
3.3 Patients must have recovered from the toxic effects of all prior therapy
prior to entry onto this trial.
3.4 Patients with brain tumors who are receiving corticosteroids for the
control of tumor-associated edema must be on a stable or decreasing
dose for at least 1 week prior to study enrollment.
3.5 Patients who have previously received temozolomide are eligible if they
have not received the drug in the past 3 months and they did not experience
severe toxicities during their previous course of therapy with temozolomide.
Severe toxicity is defined as any grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity
or failure to recover (to grade less than or equal to 1 level) from any
non-hematologic or hematologic toxicity within six weeks of receiving
temozolomide. Patients who received temozolomide in combination with
other agents that were designed to inactivate AGT are not eligible for this
trial.
3.6 Patients should be off colony stimulating factors such as G-CSF, GM-CSF,
and Epo for at least one week prior to study entry.
4. Measurable/Evaluable disease: Patients must have measurable or evaluable
disease. There must be evidence of progressive disease on prior chemotherapy
or radiation therapy or persistent disease after surgery.
5. Performance status: Patients should have an ECOG performance status of
0, 1, or 2 and a life expectancy of at least eight (8) weeks. Patients who
are unable to walk because of paralysis, but who are up in a wheel chair
will be considered ambulatory for the purpose of calculating the performance
score.
6. Hematological function: Patients must have adequate bone marrow function
defined as a peripheral absolute granulocyte count of greater than
1500/mm(3), hemoglobin greater than 8 gm/dL, and platelet count greater than
100,000/mm(3).
7. Hepatic function: Patients must have adequate liver function, defined
as bilirubin within normal limits and SGPT less than 2 times the upper
limit of normal.
8. Renal function: Patients must have an age-adjusted normal serum creatinine
or a creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).
9. Patients must be able to swallow capsules.
10. Informed consent: All patients or their legal guardians (if the patient
is less than 18 years old) must sign a document of informed consent
indicating their understanding of the investigational nature and their risks
of this study before any protocol related studies are performed. When
appropriate, pediatric patients will be included in all discussions in order
to obtain verbal assent.
11. Durable Power of Attorney (DPA): Assignment of a DPA to a family member
or guardian should be offered to all patients 18 to 21 years of age
who have a brain tumor.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
1. Patients currently receiving other investigational chemotherapeutic agents.
2. Patients with a history of myeloablative therapy requiring bone marrow
or stem cell transplantation within the previous 4 months.
3. Pregnant or breast-feeding females are excluded.
4. Clinically significant unrelated systemic illness (serious infections
or significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or other organ dysfunction)
which in the judgment of the Principal or Associate Investigator would compromise
the patient's ability to tolerate this therapy or are likely to interfere
with the study procedures or results.
5. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to dacarbazine, temozolomide,
or polyethylene glycol (PEG).

Expected Total Enrollment:  48


Location
and Contact Information

Maryland
      National Cancer Institute (NCI), 9000 Rockville Pike,  Bethesda, 
Maryland,  20892,  United States; Recruiting

Katherine E. Warren, M.D.  3014026298 
  warrenk@exchange.nih.gov 


More Information

Detailed
Web Page

Publications

Stevens
MF, Hickman JA, Langdon SP, Chubb D, Vickers L, Stone R, Baig G, Goddard
C, Gibson NW, Slack JA, et al. Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics in
mice of 8-carbamoyl-3-methyl-imidazo[5,1-d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4(3H)-one (CCRG
81045; M & B 39831), a novel drug with potential as an alternative to
dacarbazine. Cancer Res. 1987 Nov 15;47(22):5846-52.

Friedman
HS, Dolan ME, Pegg AE, Marcelli S, Keir S, Catino JJ, Bigner DD, Schold SC
Jr. Activity of temozolomide in the treatment of central nervous system tumor
xenografts. Cancer Res. 1995 Jul 1;55(13):2853-7.

Newlands
ES, Blackledge GR, Slack JA, Rustin GJ, Smith DB, Stuart NS, Quarterman CP,
Hoffman R, Stevens MF, Brampton MH, et al. Phase I trial of temozolomide
(CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856). Br J Cancer. 1992 Feb;65(2):287-91.

Study ID Numbers  000105;  00-C-0105
Study Start Date April 4, 2000
Record last reviewed  March 1, 2004
Last Updated  March 1, 2004
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier  NCT00005019
ClinicalTrials.gov processed
this record on 2004-08-31

OsteoBiologics, Inc. Receives 510(k) Clearance From FDA to Market and Distribute its PolyGraft(TM) TCP Bone Graft Substitute

OsteoBiologics, Inc. Receives 510(k) Clearance From
FDA to Market and Distribute its PolyGraft(TM) TCP Bone Graft Substitute

 
    
    

    SAN ANTONIO, Aug. 30 /PRNewswire/ -- OsteoBiologics, Inc. ("OBI"), an
innovator in tissue repair technologies, announced that it has received 510(k)
Premarket Notification from the Food and Drug Administration to market and
distribute its newest formulation of composite bone void filler device called
PolyGraft(TM) TCP Bone Graft Substitute.  The porous PolyGraft(TM) TCP
material is composed of a patented blend of polylactide-co-glycolide,
tricalcium phosphate and polyglycolide fibers.  The PolyGraft(TM) TCP material
can be fabricated into products such as granules, blocks, wedges and other
preformed shapes and is indicated to be used to fill bony voids or gaps caused
by trauma or surgery that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony
structure.  The PolyGraft(TM) TCP is intended to be gently packed into bony
voids or gaps of the skeletal system (i.e., the extremities, spine and
pelvis), and these defects may be surgically created osseous defects or bone
defects due to traumatic injury to the bone.  "OBI has developed another
composite bone void filler in which the ceramic portion resorbs slower to
enhance strength retention," stated Fred Dinger, President and CEO of OBI.
"The availability of this technology platform gives OBI the opportunity to
continue our rapid product line expansion and enables us to provide solutions
for the body to heal itself for a broader range of unmet clinical needs."
About OsteoBiologics, Inc.
    OBI, located in San Antonio, Texas, is a private company that develops and
manufactures bioabsorbable polymeric scaffolds, films, and related
instrumentation for the repair and replacement of bone, soft tissue and
cartilage.  Its products are based on proprietary and patented technologies
covered by U.S. and foreign patents.  The Company is focusing on
commercializing and further developing its platform technologies in
arthroscopy and sports medicine.  Additionally, OBI is actively forming
strategic alliances with companies serving other areas of medicine such as
spine, trauma, general orthopedics, and wound care to leverage its
technologies into those markets.
    Certain statements made in this press release are forward looking
statements as such term is defined in the Private Securities litigation Reform
Act of 1995.
    For more information, please contact Daniel Lee, Director of Marketing at
(210) 690-2131.

SOURCE OsteoBiologics, Inc.
Web Site: http://www.obi.com

FDA Grants IND for Aplidin to enter Phase II trials in US / Aplidin is also in Phase I paediatric trials for solid and haematological tumours.

FDA grants IND for Aplidin® to enter Phase II trials in US

22 June 2004

PharmaMar announces today that an Investigational New Drug application (IND)
has been accepted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the clinical
testing of Aplidin. This IND allows the start of Phase II clinical studies
in the US. Phase I clinical trials with Aplidin have been completed in Europe
and Canada.

The IND has been granted on the basis of satisfying FDA criteria regarding
preclinical data, chemistry, manufacturing and safety data from the completed
and ongoing clinical studies. Initially, two Phase II trials will run under
this IND, one in patients with multiple myeloma (EU and US), another in prostate
cancer patients (US).

Aplidin is already in clinical development in Europe and Canada for the treatment
of solid tumours, haematological malignancies and paediatric tumours. Phase
II trials are ongoing for melanoma, colorectal, renal, lung (NSCLC and SCLC),
medullary thyroid, head and neck and pancreatic carcinomas. Aplidin is also
in Phase I in paediatric trials for solid and haematological tumours.

Commenting on the IND, Isabel Lozano, PharmaMar CEO, said: “This IND is a
significant milestone for the company. It is very satisfying to have a second
compound in clinical development in the US.”

About Aplidin®
Aplidin* is a novel antitumour agent derived from the marine tunicate Aplidium
albicans. It induces rapid and persistent activation of apoptosis combined
with blocking of cell division in the G1/G2 phase of the cell cycle in tumour
cells. It also inhibits the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF), a crucial protein involved in the vascularization and growth of a
number of tumours, and the expression of the VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1).

*Aplidin® is a PharmaMar registered trademark.

PharmaMar
PharmaMar is a biopharmaceutical company, advancing cancer care through the
discovery and development of innovative marine-derived medicines. PharmaMar’s
clinical portfolio currently includes YondelisTM in phase II clinical trials
(co-developed with Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development),
designated Orphan Drug for STS by the EMEA in 2001 and Orphan Drug for ovarian
cancer in 2003; Aplidin®, in phase II, designated Orphan Drug for acute lymphoblastic
leukaemia in 2003; Kahalalide F in phase II and ES-285 in phase I clinical
trials.

PharmaMar, based in Madrid, Spain, is a subsidiary of the Zeltia Group (Spanish
stock exchange: ZEL.MC; Bloomberg: ZEL SM; Reuters: ZEL.MC). PharmaMar can
be found on the Web at http://www.pharmamar.com

For more information, please contact:

Lola Casals
PharmaMar
Tel: + 34 91 846 6000

Francetta Carr
Financial Dynamics
Tel: + 44 (0)20 7831 3113